pedro_88 Inviato 28 Gennaio, 2016 #26 Inviato 28 Gennaio, 2016 (modificato) Explain! The coin you mean to be genuine is simply worn, so the metal between the denticles is worn too. You feel better just reposting the same pictures you showed 3 times already..? I have already seen them and I carefully looked at them.. Modificato 28 Gennaio, 2016 da pedro_88 Cita
pedro_88 Inviato 28 Gennaio, 2016 #27 Inviato 28 Gennaio, 2016 This line is even here, look! But as the coin is worn, the higher part of the edge is gone.. So this is a fake too? You showed it as a genuine coin, in post #7.. Tell me, can you see the line or not? 1 Cita
villa66 Inviato 28 Gennaio, 2016 #28 Inviato 28 Gennaio, 2016 (modificato) Con simili esempi di monete contraffatte interessati possono trovare qui: http://www.lamoneta.it/topic/140533-1913-liberty-head-nickel/ I keep struggling to understand where all this is going, but I have to confess you lose me when you use the (highly unofficial :D ) "1913 Liberty Head 5-cent piece" as one of your examples. As already most ably explained in the above, the "1913 nickel" has been the object of intense and sustained scrutiny by numismatists for very nearly a century now. 90+ years of tough examination--often by folks who were aware they could help make a career out of finding out...well, anything sensational about these 5! coins. Well, those 5 coins, and the legions of converted 1903 and 1910 wannabees. I said it some time ago in one of these threads and will return to it--how about some attention to the portraits and other devices? It just seems incredible that counterfeiters could get everything right about their product except the rims. Fake "1913 Liberty Head nickels" unnoticed by the cream of American numismatics, counterfeit 1894s dimes that some of the best TPG's and best-known auction-houses are either too incompetent to detect, or else corrupt and turning a blind eye to? Sorry, just doesn't hold water. :D v. Modificato 28 Gennaio, 2016 da villa66 2 Cita
YV_ laMoneta Inviato 29 Gennaio, 2016 Autore #29 Inviato 29 Gennaio, 2016 (modificato) Unfortunately, this is an obvious fact. Purtroppo, questo è un fatto ovvio. Modificato 29 Gennaio, 2016 da YV_ laMoneta Cita
petronius arbiter Inviato 29 Gennaio, 2016 #31 Inviato 29 Gennaio, 2016 Unfortunately, this is an obvious fact. Purtroppo, questo è un fatto ovvio. But, if 4 on 5 Liberty Head nickel 1913 currently known are fakes, where are the originals? they never existed? petronius 3 Cita
YV_ laMoneta Inviato 29 Gennaio, 2016 Autore #32 Inviato 29 Gennaio, 2016 But, if 4 on 5 Liberty Head nickel 1913 currently known are fakes, where are the originals? they never existed? petronius I offer wishing to independently verify the authenticity McDermott Specimen. Cita
vathek1984 Inviato 30 Gennaio, 2016 #33 Inviato 30 Gennaio, 2016 Chi avverte i proprietari delle quattro monete false? :D 2 Cita
Risposte migliori
Unisciti alla discussione
Puoi iniziare a scrivere subito, e completare la registrazione in un secondo momento. Se hai già un account, accedi al Forum con il tuo profilo utente..